<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom of Speech as long as it is approved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amfreenet.com/2009/10/freedom-of-speech-as-long-as-it-is-approved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amfreenet.com/2009/10/freedom-of-speech-as-long-as-it-is-approved/</link>
	<description>Real Americans - Common Sense for Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://amfreenet.com/2009/10/freedom-of-speech-as-long-as-it-is-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfreenet.com/?p=1837#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>The only irony would be to the collectivist &quot;progressive&quot; mind who values government and its special interests ahead of individual liberty.  Freedom oriented people have no interest in abridging the freedoms of even the most indoctrinated of sheople.  Heinlein, of course, would disagree.  He thought that freedom carried the responsibility of service and demonstration of capacity to think.
Only those who choose to believe the common leftist &quot;call them what we are, accuse them of what we do&quot; would see irony in the post.  That&#039;s because liberal reality is based on what they feel whereas for those who value freedom reality is rational and based on objective facts and critical thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only irony would be to the collectivist &#8220;progressive&#8221; mind who values government and its special interests ahead of individual liberty.  Freedom oriented people have no interest in abridging the freedoms of even the most indoctrinated of sheople.  Heinlein, of course, would disagree.  He thought that freedom carried the responsibility of service and demonstration of capacity to think.<br />
Only those who choose to believe the common leftist &#8220;call them what we are, accuse them of what we do&#8221; would see irony in the post.  That&#8217;s because liberal reality is based on what they feel whereas for those who value freedom reality is rational and based on objective facts and critical thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SandRider</title>
		<link>http://amfreenet.com/2009/10/freedom-of-speech-as-long-as-it-is-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>SandRider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfreenet.com/?p=1837#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>irony much ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>irony much ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssgconway</title>
		<link>http://amfreenet.com/2009/10/freedom-of-speech-as-long-as-it-is-approved/comment-page-1/#comment-1597</link>
		<dc:creator>ssgconway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amfreenet.com/?p=1837#comment-1597</guid>
		<description>I was tempted to post on this, but you&#039;ve already covered everything I would have written very nicely.  I&#039;m not a Limbaugh fan, but I do not believe that any of the defamatory statements attributed to him have even a grain of truth in them, and the thugs who attacked him would have no credibility, even if those statements are true.  No person of any decency whatsoever would give one iota of consideration to anything emitting from the mouths of Sharpton or Jackson, and any &#039;church&#039; that would consider them to be &#039;ministers&#039; is no Christian church.  The only gospel that they preach is the gospel of profitable (for themselves) hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was tempted to post on this, but you&#8217;ve already covered everything I would have written very nicely.  I&#8217;m not a Limbaugh fan, but I do not believe that any of the defamatory statements attributed to him have even a grain of truth in them, and the thugs who attacked him would have no credibility, even if those statements are true.  No person of any decency whatsoever would give one iota of consideration to anything emitting from the mouths of Sharpton or Jackson, and any &#8216;church&#8217; that would consider them to be &#8216;ministers&#8217; is no Christian church.  The only gospel that they preach is the gospel of profitable (for themselves) hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

