Spanking isn’t “beating”
March 11, 2009 – 5:32 amReading the Chicago Sun-Times (I know, I know) the reportress is describing how a woman won 200k because she got in trouble at work for reporting a spanking that occurred in a bathroom where she worked.
Her slant on the article is racial (surprised?). After calling it the “black term” “whupping” she goes on about her imagined racial divide theme.
The problem is that she routinely interchanges the term “spanking” with the term “beating”. Spankings aren’t “beatings” and only a moron can’t tell the difference. Only a nanny-state inculcated nosy ninny reports a spanking to the State.
It is a typical tactic (whether conscious or not) of the busybody controllers in society to demonize something with a caustic inaccurate naming convention equating something normal (spanking) with something heinous and harmful (beating). Yet to the lady reporting there seems to be no difference as she uses the words interchangeably.
If you can’t tell the difference between swatting a recalcitrant youth on the butt and beating someone you are seriously misguided in your head. Beating is what Chris Brown allegedly did to his famous girlfriend. Beating (flogging) is what happened in 18th century navies. Spanking is swatting your kid on the butt.
I never spanked my kid, because it wasn’t ever warranted. You bet I would have if it had been necessary.
Liberal newspeak though seeks to equate them and is then presented as objective news.

One Response to “Spanking isn’t “beating””
Poor Chris Brown. That guy can’t catch a break!
By Lucian Coffey on Mar 24, 2009